Understanding what insurance professionals want and need
The project began with a comprehensive listening phase. We kicked things off with an internal workshop for staff and trustees, then ran 54 in-depth interviews with beneficiaries, brokers, insurers, Managing General Agents (MGAs), service providers and the trade press.
There was much to celebrate from the research and it was clear The Insurance Charities (as the organisation was known when we met them) was having a positive impact on people’s lives and providing a ‘safety blanket’ for the industry’s professionals past and present.
But we also heard some more challenging feedback around:
Awareness – not enough people know the charity exists. It’s the industry’s ‘best kept secret’ (which no brand should ever be).
Messaging – it needed to be clearer and more welcoming – people weren’t always sure who the charity helped, or how.
Engagement – they were struggling to reach younger industry professionals.
Name – people didn’t understand why the name was a plural. Who exactly were the Insurance Charities? This harked back to a merger many years prior, and was largely introduced to placate internal stakeholders.
Associations – marketing efforts relied on people self-identifying as ‘insurance professionals’, which many don’t.
Stigma – like many beneficiary charities, they struggled to encourage people to recognise when they needed help, and ask for support.
Understanding – even when people knew they had a problem, they didn’t necessarily know where to turn. They weren’t looking for The Insurance Charities, because they didn’t think such an organisation would even exist.
One interviewee summed it up perfectly when he said, “I’ve been in insurance for 45 years and only found out about them at a lunch two years ago. It’s a tragedy.”
As part of our immersion phase, we also reviewed the Charity’s comms, including the website. The verdict? Too corporate, too confused and too cold.